Narrow Escape

This card is really very good. Even ignoring the 2x Agility icons, it has lots of play. It's difficult to describe exactly what you would use it for, as its such a tactical card, with its use depending on the situation, but here are a few scenarios where I have found it useful.

  • Dropping a weapon or ally from hand, then using the weapon straight away with a bonus.
  • Similar to the above, but powering up with a Hot Streak, Emergency Cache, or other card
  • Using it as a pseudo-Overpower, by drawing a card, pulling a resource, (or anything else), fizzling the attack and then unloading your weapon
  • Using it to drag an enemy to a location, so somebody else can deal with it, similar to Shortcut, except you also get to do something at the end. (Evade the enemy perhaps)?
  • Using it as an Unexpected Courage for game-winning checks, possibly even by Engaging a monster you didn't need to
  • Using it for a local Dynamite Blast, followed by an attack

Basically, it is often Unexpected Courage + Dodge, all for 0 XP, 0 Resources, and even when it isn't, it can function as a double-Agility.

It's in all my rogue decks, and I rarely want to take it out. It's up there with Elusive, Leo and Lone Wolf as one of the best 0 XP Rogue cards, in my opinion. It doesn't have as much impact, but it's got so much value.

Oh, and the picture is cool too.

I think you said it yourself though--this isn't high impact. I don't think a card that makes such a small difference in the game can be compared to something like Elusive or Leo. I agree that there are some nice little efficient plays to be had here, but really nothing gamechanging at all. Especially if you had to deliberately provoke the attack of opportunity rather than taking it in the normal course of events. — CaiusDrewart · 3185
It's a value card rather than an impact one. For the same reason I'm always going to play Guts or Uncage the Soul in mystic, or Shortcut in Seeker/Mark. You are right in that Elusive/Leo are probably bad choices for comparisons; better to consider it in the same family as those others listed. — duke_loves_biscuits · 1278
note how well this combos with knocking the Ornate Bow when fighting enemies with >3 health — Zinjanthropus · 230
perfect card for solo, specially in higher difficulties.. I mean if you need to kill something after paying for a gun. this card is the must (rouge dont have enough power and this increase +2 and prevent the attack for paying for the gun). — isuscbrmid · 56
I am amazed at how it lets Trish say "Shhh, I am investigating here" to enemies engaged with her. Especially to her signature weakness. — AlderSign · 391
Improvised Weapon

Ideally you want to always play this from your discard, at which point it is like a 1-shot revolver, (that also generated whatever value put it in the discard in the first place). Playing it from your hand is generally bad. So the card looks like goes pretty well with Wendy and Pete, both of whom have strong discard-for-value abilities. Except... Wendy and Pete don't want to be fighting with their base stats. (You can't use it with Duke).

So that leaves Yorrick, Calvin, Silas, Mark, Mihn, Agnes and the 5-splashers. Many of whom would quite interested in playing it from the discard, but don't have a reliable and valuable way of getting it there .

So at the moment, it's a bit of a "no mans card". If another card for Survivor comes out that provides a discard-for-value ability, then I can see this suddenly being very playable. (Or if more cards arrive to support combat options in Wendy/Pete, but this is less likely).

I can't wait The Boundary Beyond - Quick Study looks like "pump stats for something crucial for your class" series of cards. If I'm right, then maybe survivors will get "discard for benefit" card? Only almost two weeks... :) — KptMarchewa · 1
@KptMarchewa Welp, they did! Cornered seems like it’d synergize well with this. — Death by Chocolate · 1489
I'm still not sure if this card is worth it even with Cornered. — Zuntir · 613
This card is very good for Cornered, at least if you re playing an investigator with high Combat value, because it becomes recurring discard fodder for it. — matt88 · 3210
Tested it now, and yes, it is good with Cornered. With Cornered in play, it's essentially a 1 cost event, that deals +1/+1 and draws a card. (With some side benefit against 1 attack enemies like rats). Compare this to the .45, and that's pretty good, very good in fact. — duke_loves_biscuits · 1278
Father Mateo

Sadly, I think the good Father is pretty bad, at least as Mystics go.

Firstly, he seems to be missing a stat point (at least compared to the mono-colour + trait template that Mark and Akachi set,). Although Silas too is missing this point, so perhaps it is deemed that "Blessed" and "Innate" is better than "Tactics" and "Spells", which might be true for Innate, but certainly is not for Blessed.

Compared to Agnes or Akachi, he is considerably weaker. He is missing the 5 willpower, which as we know from Jim is huge, but he is also missing the free damage or the spell charges, both of which are considerably more powerful than his own once-per-game (OPG). Compared to Marie, he lacks the investigation options or bonus actions. He compares more favorably to Jim (the current weakest mystic), but even here he loses out. Jim has more support cards now, and is generally seen to be more of a solo-investigator, and has the any-5-splash. Mateo's low strength means solo can be an issue, as he has very little options for the extra 1 point of damage on 3-health enemies if he can't find his Shriveling.

His unique asset (Codex of Ages), is good if you want to pass a single test, but its expensive, uses a hand-slot, and is especially bad in multiplayer where sealing that Elder Sign for more than 1 or 2 turns hurts the whole group. It has uses, eg, with a big Storm of Spirits play, or a Double or Nothing, but these are pretty situational. Combined with his OPG, which can only trigger on a tentacle, and you have two very niche abilities, neither of which really shine.

Then you have his weakness (the Serpents of Yig)... and by god will you hate this guy. His 3 health means that, unless you have Shrivelling5, it will take 2 shots to kill at least. He is difficult for you to deal with without big spells, his damage is pretty high, and he seals the token. He's worse than the Silver Twilight Acolyte, which is one of the worst weaknesses you can draw, and adding spiky-weaknesses to a spiky-class is never great. Every now and again, you will draw the Serpents in turn 1-3, before you can find your Shriveling or Mists, and it can be crippling.

So you have:

  • Bad statline (possibly missing a point)
  • No non-purple blessed cards released or announced yet
  • Niche OPG and signature card
  • Terrible weakness
  • Better options available

So where does this leave you? Well, his one saving grace is the +5 XP he gets at start (or in standalone). This is meant to make up for all of the above. You have lots of options here, but they tend to fall on one of the following lines:

  • (1) is to jump-start whatever build you were planning on playing. (eg, upgraded Shrivellings, Spirit Atheme). This is the approach taken in this solo deck here (https://arkhamdb.com/decklist/view/5564/solo-mateo-cheats-his-way-through-forgotten-age-1.0). This is probably the "best" approach, although if you were looking for the best, why did you pick Mateo?

  • (2) is to go for something kooky, that you wouldn't normally plan to afford, like Seal of the Elder Sign, Song of the Dead or Blood Pact, straight-away. This does allow you to explore a new direction, as Mystics normally are tight on XP, and need everything for the basics (Shrivelling + friends). This is the approach taken here (https://arkhamdb.com/decklist/view/5655/the-mostly-holy-father-a-k-a-miracle-mateo-1.0). This is probably the more "fun" approach, just ensure you still have enough game-plan to achieve what you need to. Spending all the XP on the Seal, could also be a little spiky - you might never draw it.

The impact of this XP boost can be high, especially in the first 1 or 2 scenarios, although towards the end of the campaign you're likely going to notice it less.

Overall, having played the Father in a few campaigns now, I've found him to be weak and a bit boring. I'd like to see him have many more cross-colour Blessed cards to open up his options before I'd want to play him again on Hard.

I agree. I also found Father Mateo a little bland, and the fact that Blessed cards are doing anything for him is a little sad. I think he's definitely competitive with the other Mystics early in the campaign. The 5 XP makes a big, big difference. But later on it's not as noticeable (the difference between 35 and 30 XP is far smaller than the difference between 5 and 0 XP), and he feels very vanilla. — CaiusDrewart · 3185
*Blessed cards are not doing anything for him, is what I meant. — CaiusDrewart · 3185
Having now seen a couple of the Blessed cards (in preview, not yet released), it seems they are going for a buffing and protection theme, potentially unlocking Mateo as a "Support-Mystic". This is a cool direction to go in, and I would certainly love to re-evaluate the above critique once that is possible. For now though, its a waiting game... — duke_loves_biscuits · 1278
I don't understand the hate for Jim, who can play the odds incredibly effectively. His ability nicely negates lower will, balanced stat-line boosted with "0" Skulls makes him a proficient backupfighter/investigator even if none of his spells come out. — Eruantalon · 104
Matheo's elder sign is really strong.(auto-success +free action) With Olivia McBride, he usully draws it 4-5 times in a game. Add Eucatastrophe for extra fun. — DeadGuy · 95
@Eruantalon The problem with Jim is that you usually boost yourself up to beat Skulls anyway, as Skull modifiers tend to be the least bad chaos tokens. So in terms of odds Jim is only relatively effective when he has little hope of passing anyway, which is similar to how Mateo plays. — StyxTBeuford · 13049
Doomed

Investigator weaknesses is likely my favorite mechanic in the game. And I hate it when the random basic weakness has no impact whatsoever. You can agree that impact of Paranoia is different in Jenny Barnes deck compared to for example Dark Horse "Ashcan" Pete deck. So when I play Jenny Barnes, Paranoia is one of the cards I really want to get as my random basic weakness. I (Jenny) will play the game paranoid that at some point I can lose all my "hard" earned resources. And the card impact is not just in the moments it hits. It is in the way it changes my whole gameplay because I know it can hit.

And after taking Doomed Mark Harrigan to fun trip to Carcosa (first time playing it) I can assure you - No other weakness can give you the emotional roller coaster ride that Doomed chain could !!!

Here is my report:

First scenario: No Doomed - massive disappointment

Second scenario - "doom approaches" , No big deal. The one horror hurts more .

Third scenario - Another one horror and Accursed Fate at the bottom of my deck. GAME ON!

Fourth scenario - 2 horror and "the hour is nigh". Damn that hurts! Wait a second!!! We are just four scenarios in. I should probably consider drawing less cards from my ability ...

Fifth scenario - Doing well. Don't draw any cards from Mark's ability. And suddenly 2 horror that nearly finish me off and The Bell Tolls in my deck. Next encounter phase I am defeated by horror... Damn you Doomed !!!!

Sixth scenario - Ok I was doomed from the beginning. Now I have nothing else to do but die. Better die now and play the last two scenarios with another investigator ...... Hay we won it! It is over! I am not dead!!!! Maybe if I get Key of Ys and Daisy (played by my GF) gets some Scrying I could survive a while longer?

Seventh scenario - We pull off the Scrying and Key of Ys combo to discard the The Bell Tolls from the top of my deck. Dodged that bullet! Now I can serve some justice with the Shotgun loaded with Extra Ammunition that did not get discarded!!! We made it. We found the Path to Carcosa!!!

Eight scenario - We both get bad starting hands. No Scrying, no Old Book of Lore, no Key of Ys and no weapons. I am forced to draw cards and risk meeting my inevitable doom. The tension I felt every time I had to draw a card and the relieve when it wasn't the bell were amazing. I again got my Shotgun and 2 copies of Extra Ammunition and started my vengeance on Hastur and his minions. All that while dreading the end of my turn and the upkeep phase. Luckily no bell tolling was heard till the successful end of the scenario. Mark made it! We made it against the odds! DAMN! THAT WAS INTENSE!

So to sum it up - Doomed is superb! It enhances the whole Arkham Horror experience! No! It takes it to a whole different level !!!

vvi1g12 · 22
And if you had randomly drawn The Bell Tolls early on in the seventh or eighth scenario, would that have been fun? Maybe it would have for you (and that's fine!), but for me, getting cheated out of the end of a campaign because of my random basic weakness, when no other weakness in the game is half as harsh, would not be. — CaiusDrewart · 3185
Finally. It’s nice to see someone else who likes Doomed on this site. No offense to the folks squeamish about it (I get it, I really do.), but the emotional impact and the fact that it does influence your gameplay on a strategic level is very cool. — Death by Chocolate · 1489
@Death by Chocolate: I think it boils down to the fact of variable emotional investment and what different people find exciting. Card is certainly marking a fissure among the community as to what people find fun and appealing about AH LCG, that's certain. — Skid_the_Drifter · 147
I like the flavour, but I'm not a fan of its unevenness. If Min Thi Phan gets this weakness at the start of a campaign, you might as well retire her on the spot. She basically draws through her entire deck even in a shorter scenario. — sfarmstrong · 271
Just accept that the whole game is not even and totally not fair. Some have it easier and some are doomed (Pun fully intended). What works best for me so far is picking 3-5 thematic basic weaknesses for each investigator and randomly draw one of them. For example for Min I will be considering the ones inspired from The King in Yellow ( Drawing the Sign and The Thing that Follows). — vvi1g12 · 22
@ vvi1g12 So what you're saying is that you enjoy additional masochism not provided by the original set of rules, that do not mention picking worst possible weaknesses for each investigator. In other words, this cards supports your particular viewpoint of the game - which is fine all by itself, but please be mindful that whatever works for you and whatever made you pick up this game might not allign with other people's motivations. Saying that game is "totally not fair" misses the whole point of the game, because it doesn't consist of only random elements. They take part in the game, but there's a lot of player's agency in here, a real story driven by actions, not just pure luck. There's a scale to everything, including measurement of power level of cards. It is safe to say that this basic weakness is way off from others. That would be fine by me if the game was like that from the start - but that's not the case at all. You have to either "upgrade" all other basic weaknesses or just stick to the power level of other basic weaknesses. Amping basic wekanesses up over time means only one thing: more randomness in the outcome. If this was a game of chance only it'd be fine - but it isn't and I desperately don't want it to be just that - because it has already shown it can be so much more. — Skid_the_Drifter · 147
I love doomed. My Finn managed to score a particular solution at the end of the Dunwich campaign with it and it was epic. — Tsuruki23 · 2571
Eavesdrop

For the longest time, the Rogues didn't have any cards that could "cheat out" clues--that is, get them without having to pass an investigate check. While other classes had such staples as Evidence!, "Look what I found!", Drawn to the Flame, and Working a Hunch, Rogues couldn't get clues in any other way than passing checks. This was mighty inconvenient.

And not only did Rogues have no way to get clues without passing checks--they didn't have any level 0 cards aimed at helping them pass those checks, either! (I refuse to count Dario El-Amin as a level 0 card that helps with investigation. He just isn't. Sorry.)

Now, enter Eavesdrop, our first level 0 Rogue investigation card (again, not counting Dario). But it falls a little flat, I think. It is just a little weak compared to the "discover 2 clues" cards that other factions get (you can add Scene of the Crime to the list, now.) The main problem is that you still have to pass an Intellect test. To do that on high levels, you'll need to boost considerably. Either you accept a high chance of a wasted action, card, and resource because you failed the test, or you have to dedicate way more resources than what other classes are putting in to get the 2 clues.

And that's not to mention the problem of having an unengaged enemy available. You'll probably have to evade to make that happen. Now perhaps you wanted to evade the enemy anyway (though this won't always be true), in which case we shouldn't count the action and skill test (or more) needed to do that as part of the total cost of the card. But it's still an inconvenient requirement, one that makes this card far less reliable than its competition in other factions.

Obviously, this is most playable for Finn, who gets that free evade and combines high Intellect and Agility. It's a decent choice for him to add some tempo to his clue gathering at the expense of some risk. For the other Rogues--the ones who really could have used some cluefinding help--this probably isn't the answer. They'll still need to use either XP cards or cards from other factions to solve their cluefinding issues.

This card reinforces the trend that Rogues perform better at lower levels. My complaint about still having to pass an Intellect test is perhaps not such a big deal on Easy or Standard. But it sharply limits this card on Expert (at least for people not named Finn.)

CaiusDrewart · 3185
This is just a card for Finn. Sometimes, when new investigators are released, FFG also releases cards that work only with those investigators along them. Take True Grit for example. Would you use it on any investigator other than Mark Harrigan?? I don't think so. — matt88 · 3210
I like True Grit in my Yorick deck, actually. — crymoricus · 252